|
Thomas County District Court |
|
|
15th Judicial District Court Rules
FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
RULE NO. 1 Pursuant to K.S.A. 43-166, this Court adopts the following local rule concerning jury panels and summons:
RULE NO. 2 This Court adopts the following local rule concerning Voir Dire examination of jurors:
RULE NO. 3 All pleadings, filed in Court, that require judicial action, shall have copies forwarded directly to the District Judge at the following address: District Judge, 813 Broadway, #201, Goodland, Kansas 67735
RULE NO. 4 In compliance with Supreme Court Rule 105, the following local court rules shall be adopted by the Fifteenth Judicial District:
RULE NO. 5 In compliance with K.S.A. 38-1301 et seq., the following local court rules shall be adopted by the Fifteenth Judicial District: The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act provides that litigation concerning the custody of a child (custody, change of custody, visitation rights, etc.) may take place in any court in any state where the child and his/her family have the closest connection, so that significant evidence is readily available to the court where the hearing takes place. The provisions of this law require each Clerk of the District Court to maintain a registry of uniform child custody jurisdiction actions. By this local court rule, the appearance docket and its cross-index will serve as the registry, thus avoiding duplication of filing.
RULE NO. 6 Ordinarily ex parte orders for support, restraint or other provision remedies will not be issued. Notice of an application for such remedies and a hearing in connection with the application must be given as required by Supreme Court Rule No. 131. If the matter is urgent, oral notice or notice for a period of time shorter than seven days may be acceptable. In an emergency, adequately supported by sworn oral testimony, this rule may be waived and an order issued ex parte, but in that event, a hearing will be held immediately upon request of the affected adverse party.
RULE NO. 7 Re: Establishment of Court Trustee Program a. To issue summonses, subpoenas duces tecum to obligors, obligees and other witnesses who poses knowledge or books and records relating to enforcement of support to appear in the Office of the District Court Trustees or before the district court for examination. b. To administrator oaths and take sworn testimony on the record or by affidavit; c. To appoint special process servers as required to carry out the District Court Trustee’s responsibilities under this section; d. To enter into stipulations, acknowledgments, agreements and journal entries, subject to approval of the court; e. If an obligor desires to contest an order of income withholding, the District Court Trustee shall set a hearing to permit the obligor to assert any affirmative defenses authorized by K.S.A. 23-4100; f. To act as “prosecuting attorney” in Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act cases pursuant to K.S.A. 23-451-et seq. a. A written agreement signed by all interested parties or their attorneys. Interested parties include obligors, obligees, guardian ad litem, District Court Trustees, and the Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services. b. A high degree of probability that the support payments will be made in compliance with court order. The factors considered and the rationale for granting good cause shall be documented on the record. Factors indicating such probability include, but are not limited to: 1. An automatic withdrawal authorization to the obligor’s bank or 2. The existence of a military allotment, or 3. An automatic payment from another source such as a trust fund or escrow account, or 4. The posting of a performance bond equal to the amount of support ordered for six months or more, or 5. Whether or not the obligor has an income withholding order which has been served on an employer or payor and the income withholding order is being monitored and modified by a private attorney, 6. The obligor’s payment history, or 7. Any other factor considered by the Court to be indicative of the obligor’s ability and willingness to comply with the court order. c. A history exists of the obligor having made or the obligee having accepted direct payments in conflict with an order of the Court and K.S.A. 60-1610(a)(1) within the past twelve (12) months. a. “IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all support payments shall be made payable to the order of the Kansas Payment Center; and that each party shall inform the Clerk of the District Court and all other parties, in writing, of a change of name, residence, and employer with business address with seven (7) days after such change.” b. “IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an Income Withholding Order shall be issued without further notice to the parties, specifying an amount sufficient to satisfy the order of child support and to defray any arrearage. The Income Withholding Order shall be issued regardless of whether a payor can be identified.”
Example #1: Child support is $300.00 per month and the court orders a two month abatement of support for summer visitation pursuant to the Child Support Guidelines. Twelve months at $300.00 equals $3,600.00 annual child support. Ten months of $300.00 per month actual child support equals $3,000.00. The difference between $3,600.00 and $3,000.00 equals $600.00. Six hundred dollars ($600.00) divided by 12 equals $50.00 monthly adjustment for Time Spent with Noncustodial Parent. The monthly support is $300.00 minus $50.00 equals $250.00.
Example #2: Child support is $300.00 per month and the court orders a three month temporary reduction of support to $100.00 for summer visitation. Twelve months at $300.00 per month equals $3,600.00 annual child support. Nine months of $300.00 per month actual child support plus the three months reduction to $100.00 equals $3,000.00 ($2,700.00 + $300.00). The difference is between $3,600.00 and $3,000.00 equals $600.00. Six hundred dollars ($600.00) divided by 12 equals $50.00 monthly adjustment for Time Spent with Noncustodial Parent. The monthly support is $300.00 minus $50.00 equals $250.00.
The Court may approve other methods of arriving at a level periodic child support payment schedule, if the method is found to be equitable and in the best interest of the child, the obligee and obligor.
RULE NO. 8 This rule is in consideration of K.S.A. 38-1636 concerning extended jurisdiction in juvenile cases within the Fifteenth Judicial District. When a District Magistrate Judge either authorizes the prosecution of a respondent as an adult in a juvenile offender case pursuant to K.S.A. 1636(f)(1) or designates any juvenile offender case an extended jurisdiction juvenile prosecution pursuant to K.S.A. 38-1636(f)(2), the proceedings shall be transferred forthwith to the Administrative Judge for assignment and scheduling in due course within the adult criminal process. The respondent shall be entitled to the full protection of the Kansas Code of Criminal Procedure. The District Judge shall schedule pretrial and such further hearings as necessary to facilitate trial by jury and timely prosecution of the pending charges. Upon conviction the District Judge shall impose sentence in accordance with K.S.A. 38-1663 and K.S.A. 38-16,126 and other appropriate statutes. Adopted this 31st day of March, 1998.
|